ROFL... Banned WHILE banned!

Katielicious Kat Mallow · Feb 6, 2016

Hey Helena - told you I would move :-)

DTF_The_Prophet · Feb 6, 2016

Banned: Excessive complaining (I didn't know telling the truth is complaining)

Date ban will be lifted: Never

And its been the best thing that could have happened to me!

I just love this place and all you people.

You are those who are proving that not all people are brain dead sheep who will follow in line no matter how big the butchers cleaver is and how bloody it gets...

Enough is enough though and that point has been reached already..

I hope most people realize that they are free to leave that concentration camp and that they are most welcome here and they can all come to a REAL EU forum - EPF - to discuss things in a non-censored environment, where the discussion winners are not predefined (especially when talk comes to MA's screw-ups) and no cover-ups etc..

Basically if you were trapped in that horrible place, you know what coming to paradise feels like when you come to EPF :))

FatherJack · Feb 7, 2016

I never came close to being banned there I just never gave a shit enough to post regularly

Internet_bcf757_2800128 by FatherJack posted Feb 7, 2016 at 16:25

mastermesh · Feb 7, 2016

all this talk of 711... funny pic over on Rocktropia of his current state.

Katielicious Kat Mallow · Feb 7, 2016

Who was force? Never came across him.

narfi · Feb 7, 2016

Katielicious Kat Mallow said: ↑

Who was force? Never came across him.
Click to expand...

If you watch the docudrama about NEVERDIE you will see force is his money man.

mastermesh · Feb 7, 2016

Force used to be married to Pink Pussycat Panther (an old soc mate from way back - she did a lot of weekly events in the old cnd asteroid) before they got divorced several years ago. He was the head of Rock Stars pvp group that was funded by Neverdie Studios back when RT first opened. Quite a few threads from back in those days on various forums.... I think there was even an old entropiatimes article that mentioned him from way back.

DTF_The_Prophet · Feb 7, 2016

narfi said: ↑

If you watch the docudrama about NEVERDIE you will see force is his money man.
Click to expand...

Where can this docudrama be found, youtube? Whats the title? :)

Katielicious Kat Mallow · Feb 7, 2016

I saw it - it was something to do with Neverdie leaking secrets (I think)

narfi · Feb 7, 2016

DTF_The_Prophet said: ↑

Where can this docudrama be found, youtube? Whats the title? :)
Click to expand...

NEVERDIE - I AM MY AVATAR DOCUDRAMA

Mac y Lir · Feb 7, 2016

Force Merge something or other iirc.
I think I had a couple temp bans over the years.
The only one I had any problem with really was that mindstar9 chick.
Oh wait.. :P
:D

mastermesh · Feb 8, 2016

>

but... when you watch it keep in mind the info over at http://www.entropiaplanets.com/threads/editorial-the-story-of-neverdie-truth-or-fiction.4739/

Also, a little off topic but not entirely... considering the lengths ND will go to to seek fame and fortune...
https://entropiascams.wordpress.com/2015/01/02/entropia-scammers-list/

Apparently Jon NEVERDIE Jacob’s father, Adrian, wrote a book similar to Harry Potter before Harry Potter was big, and now Adrian’s heirs are suing JK Rowling over it?… but they had to pay 1.5 Million in order to just get the right to sue because the Judge didn’t think there was much of a case… a payment that was never made… so it all got dropped… http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1193283/JK-Rowling-sued-500m-plagiarism-lawsuit-family-late-Willy-The-Wizard-author.html http://www.entropiaplanets.com/forums/threads/neverdie-news-legal-battle-willy-the-wizard-vs-harry-potter-update.4595/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1330552/Jon-Jacobs-sells-virtual-nightclub-Club-Neverdie-online-Entropia-game-400k.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1368493/Author-claimed-JK-Rowling-stole-idea-Harry-Potter-ordered-pay-1-5m-security-plagiarism-case-starts.html?ito=feeds-newsxml http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_disputes_over_the_Harry_Potter_series

Adrian Jacobs In June 2009, the estate of Adrian Jacobs, a children’s author who died in 1997, sued Rowling’s publishers, Bloomsbury, for £500 million, accusing her of having plagiarised “substantial parts” of his work in writing the novel Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.[23][24] In a statement, Jacobs’s family claimed that a scene in Goblet of Fire was substantially similar to Jacobs’s book The Adventures of Willy the Wizard: Livid Land: “‘Both Willy and Harry are required to work out the exact nature of the main task of the contest which they both achieve in a bathroom assisted by clues from helpers, in order to discover how to rescue human hostages imprisoned by a community of half-human, half-animal fantasy creatures.”[24] Wikinews has related news: Scholastic sued for Harry Potter copyright infringement They also launched a joint suit against Rowling and her publishers. Bloomsbury countered with a statement of its own, saying that “This claim is without merit and will be defended vigorously,” and that Rowling “had never heard of Adrian Jacobs nor seen, read or heard of his book Willy the Wizard until this claim was first made in 2004, almost seven years after the publication of the first Harry Potter book.”[24] The Jacobs estate, driven by his son and grandson, have published a website with details and excerpts from the book, according to the Toronto Star.[25] In July 2010, the estate filed suit against Rowling’s American publisher, Scholastic, demanding that the company burn all copies of Goblet of Fire.[26] On January 6, 2011, the US lawsuit against Scholastic was dismissed. The judge in the case stated that there simply wasn’t enough similarity between the two books to make a case for plagiarism.[27] In the UK courts, on March 21, 2011, Paul Allen, a trustee of the Jacobs estate, was ordered to pay as security to the court 65% of the costs faced by Bloomsbury and Rowling, amounting to over £1.5million, to avoid the claim being struck out.[28] It was reported in The Bookseller[29] that Paul Allen has appealed against paying this sum. As a condition of the appeal, he paid £50,000 to the court in May 2011. [30] The claim was formally struck out in July 2011 after the deadline for Allen’s initial payment was missed. [31]

————– http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/jul/18/harry-potter-plagiarism-struck-out

Harry Potter plagiarism claim struck out Paul Allen, who claimed a Harry Potter plot was lifted from another book, failed to meet a court payment deadline Share 33 Press Association guardian.co.uk, Monday 18 July 2011 10.10 EDT Article history Harry Potter fans buying The Goblet of Fire when it first hit bookshops in July 2000 Harry Potter fans buying The Goblet of Fire when it first hit bookshops in July 2000. Photograph: Jill Connelly/AP A claim that JK Rowling lifted the plot of one of her Harry Potter books from the work of another writer has been struck out after the claimant failed to meet a deadline for paying the first instalment of £1.5m into court as security for costs. The court of appeal ordered last week that the claimant, Paul Allen, trustee of the estate of Adrian Jacobs, who died in 1997, should pay the first part of the money into court by 4pm on Friday last week, or the case would be struck out. The claim has now failed as no payment was made. The move marks the end of a bitterly fought battle in which Rowling was accused of having lifted the plot of the fourth book in the series – Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire – from Jacobs’s book, Willy the Wizard. She and her publisher, Bloomsbury, had faced a demand for more than A$1bn (£659m) in damages. Solicitor David Hooper, a partner with the law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain, which represented Bloomsbury, said: “They have not paid the money into court. “The whole thing is a scandal – it has been going on for seven years. It was an absolutely ludicrous case.” The claimants had spent well over £1m, he said. Rowling has described the claim that her book was copied from Willy the Wizard as “not only unfounded but absurd”, and said she had never even seen the book until Allen’s claim was launched in 2004. Her solicitor, Gideon Benaim, a partner at Schillings, said: “An enormous amount of time has been wasted having to defend against this claim, when it was quite obvious to us from the outset that it had no chance of success. “As the judge noted, those behind the claim set about publicising the case with a view to exerting pressure and promoting their ‘book’. Quite how they ever thought that we would succumb to pressure indicates a complete lack of understanding on their part. We are glad that the substantive action is now at an end.” Mr Justice Kitchin ordered the payment into court in March, saying that Allen should pay security for 65% of the costs faced by Rowling and her publisher, Bloomsbury. There were to be three staged payments – the first, of £322,691 for Bloomsbury’s costs and £571,613 for Rowling’s costs, to be made by 21 April; the second, £24,650 for Bloomsbury’s costs and £178,441 for Rowling’s costs, to follow by 5 August; and the final payments, of £129,373 for Bloomsbury’s costs and £318,975 for Rowling’s, to be made by 11 November. The court of appeal rejected the appeal against that decision last Thursday, saying the first payment should be made by 4pm on Friday or the case would be struck out. The same claim had already been comprehensively rejected in the US, where a judge in the Manhattan-based US district court for the southern district of New York said that “the contrast between the total concept and feel of the works is so stark that any serious comparison of the two strains credulity”. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was 734 pages long while the Willy the Wizard book consisted of just 16 pages of text, the judge said. He added that the Willy the Wizard book was “entirely devoid of a moral message or intellectual depth”, in contrast to Goblet of Fire, a cumulative work in which one scene built on another, the storyline was highly developed and complex, and there was “a highly developed moral core” and overarching messages were conveyed through the plot. Mr Justice Kitchin, sitting in the chancery division of the high court, had ordered the security for costs payment after having rejected an application by Rowling and Bloomsbury for summary judgment, although he thought the plagiarism claim had an “improbable” chance of success. But he also made it clear that he was unhappy with the way the litigation was being conducted, and the behaviour of Allen and people associated with him. Allen, he said, was a nominal claimant – he was in truth suing for the benefit of another. But the evidence from Allen, a property developer, about the means available to him and those supporting him, was “far from full or candid”. There were also indications of a want of good faith on the part of Allen and those associated with him, and those behind the claim “have also engaged in what I think the defendants fairly describe as thinly veiled threats to publicise the allegation that Ms Rowling has engaged in plagiarism”. David Markson, literary agent for the Jacobs estate, and his brother, Max Markson, a public relations executive in Australia, had tried to pressure Rowling into a settlement and had warned that failure to settle the claim would lead to “unwelcome publicity”, the judge said.
Click to expand...

Log in / Register

Forums

ROFL... Banned WHILE banned!

Katielicious Kat Mallow

DTF_The_Prophet

FatherJack El Diablo

mastermesh

Katielicious Kat Mallow

narfi Lost

mastermesh

DTF_The_Prophet

Katielicious Kat Mallow

narfi Lost

Mac y Lir

mastermesh

Log in / Register

Useful Searches

ROFL... Banned WHILE banned!

FatherJack El Diablo

narfi Lost

narfi Lost