I don't recall reading that MA paid SEE. Would you please link to earlier thread or provide source? Thanks
Well MA had to pay back the 6 million dollar that SEE spend for buying the planet, some of which no doubt was already spend on castles and stuff. Not sure if there was extra compensation for SEE, don;t think there was anything about that in their annual reports either (just the 6 million)
contracts are a great thing.. but.. if one side works on purpose to screw the other... contracts are pretty much useless. all one has to do is prove the screw....
As I recall, SEE never finished paying their instalments for Calypso. That's why MA took it back initially. Granted I may indeed be remembering incorrectly.
I think I remember something in their annual report about the 6 million dollar payed back, lemme check
Razer, thank you for posting this information from the annual report. It appears from this statement that there was no payment to SEE.
It's correct that SEE never paid the full prize for Planet Calypso. But, afaik, SEE stopped payments intentionally for very specific reasons... And yes, MindArk had to pay to SEE for the final settlement: Source: Page 2 of MindArk's semi-annual report Jan-Jun 2012 In the end the failed SEE deal might have turned into a huge success, because MA claimed the sale of CLDs receiving 50% of Caly revenues for the same 6 Million dollars that SEE was supposed to pay for the whole planet... (if just Maxim Overdrive...)
Page 6 and 7: http://www.mindark.com/investor-relations/financial-reports/documents/ANNUAL_REPORT_MindArk_2012.pdf Page 4.. http://www.entropiaplanets.com/w/images/6/64/MindArk_Semi-Annual_Report_January-June_2013.pdf
One aspect why I dislike 'large' 'active' forums is the fact that usually the majority of people there lack knowledge, intellect and ethics, yet insist to present their gibberish based on wrong assumptions (even though contrary facts have been presented multiple times already) as the one and only truth... it's completely inexplicable how one can think that the LAs have been created intentionally with bugs and without the intent to use them how LAs are supposed to be used as far as we know the bugs that made the LAs unusable have been fixed at least partially on the development backend but the fix never made it into the game for currently unkown reasons as far as we know the items were not created merely to be company assets only to be used by the company but supposed to become regular player-owned LAs as far as we know two of at least five such LAs were given by an official PP avatar controlled by a PP employee to the private avatar of a person who provided services to the PP, among other things as a payment for said services, hence the LAs should have become the private "property" (EULA aside...) of the paid person as far as we know nothing suggests a theft or any other form of illegal action, the only irregularity seems to be the fact that the LAs originally "were not approved for sale" by MindArk and as a consequence using them as a form of payment might have been a breach of the contract between MA and the PP all of the above is actually confirmed by MindArk's behaviour, only mentioning that the LAs "were never approved for sale", but NOT taking any action regarding private ownership of what potentially could have been PP assets, obviously not rectifying the situation with the PP even though potentially there might have been a breach of contract, and NOT taking any action against further P2P trading of the LAs although they were aware that it's happening The formal and legal aspects of all this mess do not even matter much, what does matter is fairness, equal treatment, and how players' "property" (EULA aside...) potentially worth thousands of dollars is dealt with. Since EU all revolves around "real money" it's ultimately a matter of trust in MA and the platform, consequently market value of any EU item is influenced negatively by this mess MA is ultimately responsible for and so far failed to 'clean up'. I just hope they'll take any reasonable action before this issue is discussed on other platforms than 'just' EU community sites...
Yup, this one was rather blatant I thought. Clever on MA's part, they got to sell half the planet for the full wack cost. That said though they did need to keep developing it themselves so fairs fair I guess. I suppose the deed pay outs are sorta similar to what the PP would have banked anyhow. Interesting that MA had to refund SEE what they paid... still, I guess this should be no biggie, after all, they paid it to MA in the first place. Easy come easy go as they say... and it isn't like the SEE fiasco went on that long... about half a year or something was it? As for this Land Area thing... urrgh typical MA yes they are covering themselves with glory as usual I see. That said, and I know this won't make me any friends here with this view but it does sound a lot like Next Island distributed something without MA's consent. I don't know what the agreements were between the companies but I'm guessing such things were not allowed. I feel where MA fell down here is not acting on it straight away when it became apparent that the deeds were not in the hands of a PP. They should have contacted the PP and asked them to settle up with that player via cash or some other means and transferred the deeds back to NI. Intentionally leaving it scuppered was a fairly childish move akin to sweeping the problem under the carpet. With the current "solution"... sigh... I don't know... I can see why they opted to just "forget the whole thing" and "not our problem" it. Next Island is a (rather pretty) blot on the landscape that it is high time MA did something about. I'd happily see it dumped onto Calypso as a third continent with a bit of reworking of the storyline/content so it fits. After all MA have done worse before with their storyline before. I think at the end of the day if MA can ignore Next Island they can ignore a couple of LA's on it just as easily. We don't know what the deal is with NI but I'm fairly certain MA don't "own" it or else they'd probably do something with it to make it work with the rest of EU. As it is, its like a forgotten land mine waiting to fuck over new potential players. It is entirely possible that MA themselves have somehow been left with a white horse that legally they have no power to exercise control over. There may well be a reason why they say "talk to David Post" maybe they themselves can't contact him either. I guess as usual all I'm saying is "we simply don't know" and that "things may not always be as they seem". Like most conversations about the why and how of MA, this one really can't continue without more facts on the table or input from MA. Call me next decade when that happens Wistrel PS I do agree that this reflects negatively on MA and also introduces yet more mistrust and instability to the platform. I'm just saying that maybe this time MA have their hands tied somehow or other
Did they now? SEE, I'm not convinced that was the case. Rather, I'm under the impression SEE walked away with more than what they paid. I have no proof for this, but if I remember correctly, SEE was supposed to cough up 6 million USD in periodic installments. The first one of those happened, as far as I know, the end. And then MA's financial reports started speaking of settlement payments, and their negative influence on the results. Some of that can probably be attributed to accounting practices (cooking the books), but MA hoped to get 6 million for Calypso. They got paid 1 million, were forced to settle with SEE (it'd be interesting checking court records, actually), and then sold off the planet for 6 million to players instead. Let's assume the most optimistic scenario for MA. They got paid 1 million, and were forced to repay that. In the original arrangement, they handed over the planet (And thus 50% of the revenue) to the PP. They repay the 1 mio, but now MA's subsidiary Planet Calypso (whatever the heck their name happens to be. The company SSimmonds was put in control of) has to share the regular 50% PP revenue with the participants. Normally that wouldn't be an issue as the MA mother company still gets its 50%. However, now the daughter company stands to only make 50% of its regular revenue (assuming no further measures were taken to tilt the scales). If you assume a more pessimistic scenario, MA got 1 mio, had to pay back more than that, so rather than making 6 mio, they made less than that, and have to share the PP revenue for Calypso with the participants. I'm personally in the pessimist camp. And this comes on top of the tanking loss of the Dresden castle. Someone at MA HQ *cough*Jan*cough* has been asleep at the wheel for a prolonged period of time.
Well, and then, there's also a camp thinking that the omnious Hong Kong investor Maxim Overdrive Hammer is fake and most CLDs still belong to MA in some way or another, not sure whether that's optimistic or pessimistic, harhar
Part of me believes that Marco is sitting on some CLDs or something similar somehow after the dust settled. It's too bad that Hanne and co. got dragged along through the dirt, but that's just the way they work at the top of the pyramid scheme I guess...
First time I hear of this CLD incident..wow...thanks :'D...but.... -An Avatar pops up with like way more then 2.000.000 US Dollars, (ok, nothing unusual here, happens every 2-4 years inside here Anshe Chung, Wirecard Bank, moneta.ru...Neveride) ;D ready to be "dumped" into Entropia Universe. -He "sniped" tenthousands of CLD's, trying to sell these in...uhm... "batches" of 5000-7000, while keeping the majority of his CLD's. -Was he expecting to get rich ? -Maybe he was a bored rich fook ? -1 forum post right in the end of 2012 -No skills,bought "Zero Legend Business" suit, but kept Urban Nomad Walker Shoes ? :O ;D I was somehow proud to be a part of the game, that had the "Treasure Island Sale" happening in 2004. And it was always great to talk about it as it easily grabbed peoples attention. Also because there was a face behind it and it became an ongoing process. I even made other people and friends play this universe. And they enjoyed it as well. The "Club Neverdie" sale already felt different, if not shady already and the bank-pawnshop-sales and now this "CLD incident" somehow feel so wrong to me, in so many ways, that I dont talk about Entropia in public anymore and wouldnt recommend it to other people. Also one of my best reallife friends scammed me (5000 PED) and Venus (Shadow Armor (F)) one day,..which once again showed what this game is all about. Money and greed. While money and greed was only a very small part (but always present) of the Entropia 10 years ago, it was all about community, making international friendships, exploring, sharing and caring.
Interesting... Admin why would MA have had to pay back more than SEE originally paid? I'm not saying they didn't, I'm just wondering what theory/reason you have as to why they'd pay more than they received to end the deal? Some sort of damages? I didn't know the name of Mr Big CLD guy but I heard rumour he had been identified by those playing the CLD market who had noticed a "regular" on the auction scene. The theory I heard was that he was simply an investor with cash to speculate and no other interest in the game. The money spent isn't that high for a serious investor with a large portfolio. There are after all a lot of rich people in the world. As for the suit... a lot of trader types seem to buy those. Not sure why... maybe they feel it gives anyone they trade with a feeling of confidence cause the guy at the other end has a suit on. I admit there is some truth to that. I tend to trust people who are "dressed well" in game more than those who are not. They don't have to be wearing a suit though. For me the trust comes from the fact that the person clearly has some "investment" (not necesarily financial) in their appearance and avatar and therefore has assigned some personal value to their rep. In short I tend to trust people who appear to feel they "have a rep to protect". Wistrel
Possibly. The details of the settlement were kept private, so your guess is as good as mine. I simply looked at the data in the financial report, and concluded that something didn't add up.