Kepler’s third law is not wrong.But a mistakeIn astronomy, Kepler’s laws give a description of the motion of planets around the Sun.Kepler's laws are strictly only valid for not affected by the gravity of other planets. Nevertheless,Kepler’s third law did not follow this restriction. For this reason, Kepler’sthird law have no use at all in our Solar System, Kepler's third law assumes that planet is not affected by the gravity of other planets and the orbit of every planet is an ellipse with the Sun at one of the two foci.This is not true. If the planet did not affected by the gravity of other planets, the orbit of every planet is a circle. The orbit of the planet have an ellipse only because affected by the gravity of other planets., Kepler’sthird law,T^2/a^3=K, only good for comets not for our Solar System,for this mistake we have a new third law as T^2/(ab)^3/2=K. I will add three new laws: Forth law: In solar system, All planets no mater their size, their mass, their radius should follow T^2/(ab)^3/2=1, Where T is Orbit Period, a is semi-major respect to earth b is semi-minor respect to earth Fifth law: In solar system, every precession of the orbits of planets has different ellipses. Every different ellipse has its orbital eccentricity between maximum e and 0. And all different ellipses have the same area, include circle of e=0. For example: The precession of the orbit of Mercury is 5600 arc sec/century. Every year have different ellipse between e= 0.20563069 and e=0. But every different ellipse or circle has the same area. Sixth law: To determine whether it is a planet or not, not according their size, their mass, their radius, or their not round, but one must fulfill the forth law. For example: Conclusion: 1. Obviously, Pluto not follow the forth law, so Pluto is not a planet, not because it small, not because it agley not round, only because it not one of the family. 2. There are two reasons. Pluto not belongs to solar system. A. Pluto may come from other galaxies. B. Pluto may joint with a planet and a member of other galaxies. 3. A planet cannot be discriminate, because their size, their mass, their radius, their color, they are agley not round .As long as they fulfill with the forth law.
Once I got over the possibility that Kepler 3 is wrong, I got stuck at the assertion that it has no use at all in our solar system, since clearly the last 400 odd years of astronomy have had no influence from Kepler whatsoever. Once I got past that assertion, I got stuck at the claim that a planet's orbit is only an ellipse because of the effect of other planets' gravitation, and if other planets didn't exist all orbits would be perfectly circular. Why? Reason not given. Fail.