To get rid of this ad please Sign up/Login.
Difference between revisions of "Template:Setup checker query/Proto"
| Line 887: | Line 887: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=" | |colspan="5" | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU}} < 2.8 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of less than 2.8dpp which is considered to be an extremely poor combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | ||
| Line 993: | Line 993: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=" | |colspan="5" | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage2}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU2}} < 2.8 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of less than 2.8dpp which is considered to be an extremely poor combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage2}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU2}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage2}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU2}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage2}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU2}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage2}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU2}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | ||
| Line 1,098: | Line 1,098: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=" | |colspan="5" | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage3}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU3}} < 2.8 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of less than 2.8dpp which is considered to be an extremely poor combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage3}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU3}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage3}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU3}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage3}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU3}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage3}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU3}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | ||
| Line 1,202: | Line 1,202: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan=" | |colspan="5" | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage4}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU4}} < 2.8 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of less than 2.8dpp which is considered to be an extremely poor combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage4}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU4}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage4}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU4}} < 2.85 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.8dpp to 2.85dpp which is considered to be a poor eco combination and should be avoided whenever possible. | | ||
{{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage4}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU4}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | {{#ifexpr: {{#var:AdjDamage4}} / {{#var:TotalCostMU4}} < 2.9 | This Combination has an Adjusted Eco of 2.85 to 2.9dpp which is considered to be a good eco combination. | | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 25 August 2014
| Combo Setup | Enhancers | Damage | Cost | MAX | Adjusted | ||||||||||||
| Weapon | Amplifier | Accu | Dmg | Eco | Range | Skill | Max | Adj | TT | TT+MU | Attacks | DPS | Eco | Eco+MU | DPS | Eco | Eco+MU |
| {{{Weapon}}} | {{{Amp}}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. |
| {{{Weapon2}}} | {{{Amp2}}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. |
| {{{Weapon3}}} | {{{Amp3}}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. |
| {{{Weapon4}}} | {{{Amp4}}} | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. | 0 | Division by zero. | Expression error: Unexpected < operator. |